Monday, 16 January 2012

She was forced to marry someone she did not want. Can she use contraceptive pills?

I got married a short time ago, but I am not happy with my husband. My family forced me to marry him. My problem is that I do not want to have children from him. Is it permissible for me to pray to Allaah not to give me children from him, or is that not permitted? I have read that it is not permissible to use contraceptive pills without the husband’s permission. Is this true?.

Praise be to Allaah.  

It is not permissible for the guardian, whether he is the father or anyone else, to marry off anyone under his care without her consent, because the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: “A previously-married woman has more right concerning herself than her guardian, and the permission of a virgin should be sought (regarding marriage), and her permission is her silence.” Narrated by Muslim, 1421. 

It was narrated from Abu Hurayrah (may Allaah be pleased with him) that the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: “No previously-married woman should be married off without being consulted, and no virgin should be married off without asking her permission.” They said: “O Messenger of Allaah, what is her permission?” He said: “If she remains silent.” Narrated by al-Bukhaari, 4843; Muslim, 1419. 

Similarly, it is not permissible for a guardian to be stubborn about the marriage of a female under his care, or to prevent her from marrying someone she wants to marry if he is compatible with her. The Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: “If there comes to you one with whose religious commitment and character you are pleased, then marry (your female relative under your care) to him, for if you do not do that there will be fitnah (tribulation) in the land and much corruption.” Narrated by al-Tirmidhi, 1084; classed as hasan by al-Albaani. See also question no. 32580. 

With regard to what has happened to you, you have the choice of whether to stay or not. Seek guidance from Allaah (by praying istikhaarah). If you agree to stay in this marriage then all well and good, but if you do not accept to stay with your husband, then you have the right to seek annulment of the marriage, because it took place without your consent. 

It was narrated from Khansa’ bint Khizaam al-Ansaariyyah that her father married her off when she had been previously married, and she did not like that. She went to the Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) and he annulled the marriage. Narrated by al-Bukhaari, 4845. And it was narrated from Ibn ‘Abbaas (may Allaah be pleased with him) that a virgin girl came to the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) and told him that her father had married her off against her objections. The Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) gave her the choice. Narrated by Abu Dawood, 2096; classed as saheeh by al-Albaani. 

The majority of scholars are of the view that if a woman is married off without her consent, then the marriage contract is invalid, because it is a forbidden contract which cannot be validated. This is the view of the Shaafa’is and Hanbalis. 

The view of the Hanafis, which was also narrated in one report from Ahmad, is that the contract is dependent upon the woman’s acceptance. If she gives her consent then it is valid, otherwise she may annul it.

 See al-Mughni, 7/364; Fath al-Baari, 9/194 

But so long as the court is in charge of marriages, it is better to refer such matters to the court. 

Shaykh Ibn ‘Uthaymeen (may Allaah have mercy on him) said, concerning the matter of a father forcing his daughter to marry: It is haraam for a man to force his daughter to marry a man whom she does not want to marry, and what is haraam cannot be validated or implemented, because implementing it or validating it goes against the prohibition that has been narrated.  When sharee’ah forbids a matter, then we should not be involved in it or do it. If we validate it, that means that we have becomes involved in it and done it, and we have made it equivalent to the contracts that are permitted in sharee’ah. 

Based on this, the correct view is that the marriage arranged by the father to a man whom his daughter does not want as a husband is an invalid marriage, and the contract is invalid, and should be examined by the court. 

See al-Fataawa, p. 760; see also Fataawa al-Shaykh Ibn Ibraaheem, 10/73-78 

With regard to your taking contraceptive pills without your husband’s knowledge, this is not a solution to the problem, because this means that you are staying with one whom you do not like. As stated in the fatwa of Shaykh Ibn Ibraaheem mentioned above, some of the scholars have stated that if a women shows that she accepts her marriage to someone to whom she was married by force, then she forfeits the right to seek annulment of the marriage. If she forfeits the right to seek annulment, then the man becomes a legitimate husband to her. If that is the case, then it is not permissible for you to take contraceptive pills without his knowledge, if there is a need for that. 

See also question no. 5196, 22760.

Thursday, 12 January 2012

Meaning of the verse, “and do not throw yourselves into destruction”

Can you please clarify the meaning of the verse of 2.195] And spend in the way of Allah and cast not yourselves to perdition with your own hands, and do good (to others); surely Allah loves the doers of good. I am confused because on this fatwa it refered to not spending in the cause of Allah The question number 46807 .
but then I read another fatwa where it said refered to it as killing yourself If I have understood it correctly Sheik. The question number 21589 Can you please clarify Sheik?.

Praise be to Allaah.  
The scholars – mufassireen, fuqaha’ and others -- are unanimously agreed that the verse in which Allaah says (interpretation of the meaning): “And spend in the Cause of Allaah (i.e. Jihad of all kinds) and do not throw yourselves into destruction (by not spending your wealth in the Cause of Allaah), and do good. Truly, Allaah loves Al-Muhsinoon (the good-doers)” [al-Baqarah 2:195] was revealed in the context of enjoining spending, and with regard to the reason for the revelation of this verse it was narrated that some of the Sahaabah wanted to focus on their farms and trade, and forsake jihad for the sake of Allaah, and Allaah warned them against doing that in this verse. 
Imam al-Bukhaari (may Allaah have mercy on him) narrated from Hudhayfah ibn al-Yamaan (may Allaah be pleased with him) that he said concerning this verse: It was revealed concerning spending (in the way of Allaah). End quote. (al-Bukhaari, no. 4516). 
Al-Tirmidhi (2972) narrated that Aslam Abu ‘Imraan said: We were in the city of the Byzantines and there came out to us a large number of Byzantines. One of the Muslim men charged at the Byzantine ranks until he penetrated among them, and the people shouted and said: Subhaan Allaah! He has thrown himself into destruction! Abu Ayyoob al-Ansaari stood up and said: O people, you are misinterpreting this verse. Rather this verse was revealed concerning us Ansaar, when Allaah granted victory to Islam and the number of its supporters increased. We said to one another in private, and not to the Messenger of Allaah (blessings and peace of Allaah be upon him): Our wealth and property have diminished. Allaah has granted victory to Islam and the number of its supporters has increased. We should focus on our wealth and property and try to take care of them. Then Allaah revealed to His Prophet (blessings and peace of Allaah be upon him) a verse which refuted what we said: “And spend in the Cause of Allaah (i.e. Jihad of all kinds) and do not throw yourselves into destruction (by not spending your wealth in the Cause of Allaah)”. So destruction here referred to focusing on wealth and property, and abandoning jihad. Abu Ayyoob continued to strive in jihad for the sake of Allaah until he was buried in Constantinople.
Classed as saheeh by al-Albaani in al-Silsilah al-Saheehah, 13. 
Despite that, the scholars -- both earlier and later -- also quoted this verse as evidence to show that it is forbidden to kill oneself or harm oneself or throw oneself into destruction by any means, based on the general meaning of the words of the verse and by analogy, and they affirmed the basic usooli principle which says: what counts is the general meaning of the words, not the specific reason for revelation. 
Al-Haafiz Ibn Hajar (may Allaah have mercy on him) said: 
As for restricting it to that -- meaning restricting the verse to the matter of not spending for the sake of Allaah -- that is subject to further discussion, because what counts is the general meaning of the wording. End quote. 
Fath al-Baari, 8/185 
Al-Shawkaani (may Allaah have mercy on him) said: 
i.e., do not do that which will bring about your destruction. The salaf had a number of opinions concerning the meaning of the verse. The truth is that what matters is the general meaning of the wording not the specific reason for revelation. Everything that may be called destruction in religious or worldly terms is included in that. This is the view of Ibn Jareer al-Tabari. End quote. 
Fath al-Qadeer, 1/193 
This is also indicated by the various interpretations that the salaf gave for this verse. It was narrated from al-Bara’ ibn ‘Aazib (may Allaah be pleased with him) that he regarded the one who committed a sin then despaired of the mercy of Allaah as throwing himself into destruction. 
Ibn Hajar said in Fath al-Baari (8/33): It was narrated by Ibn Jareer and Ibn al-Mundhir with a saheeh isnaad. 
Thus it becomes clear that the two answers previously given on our website do not contradict one another. What is mentioned in question number 46807 explains the reason for the revelation of this verse and the context in which it was revealed. 
The answer to question number 21589 is quoting as evidence the general meaning of the wording of the verse, and explaining that it is not permissible to throw oneself into destruction in any sense, whatever the form of this destruction or harm. 
And Allaah knows best.

Commentary on the verse in which Allaah says (interpretation of the meaning): “And most of them believe not in Allaah except that they attribute partners unto Him (i.e. they are Mushrikûn, i.e. polytheists” [Yoosuf 12:106]

Allaah, may He be exalted, says: “And most of them believe not in Allaah except that they attribute partners unto Him (i.e. they are Mushrikûn, i.e. polytheists” [Yoosuf 12:106]. What is the meaning of this verse? What is meant by shirk in this verse?.

Praise be to Allaah.
The scholars, such as Ibn ‘Abbaas and others, have explained its meaning. What it means is that when the polytheists are asked who created the heavens and earth, and who created them, they say Allaah, yet despite this they worship idols and statues like al-Laat, al-‘Uzza and others, they seek help from them, and they make vows and offer sacrifices to them. This belief of theirs is Tawheed al-Ruboobiyyah (belief in oneness of divine Lordship), but it is invalidated and corrupted by their association of others with Allaah (shirk) and does not avail them anything. Abu Jahl and his ilk believed that Allaah was their Creator and Provider, and the Creator of the heavens and the earth, but this did not avail them anything, because they associated others with Allaah by worshipping idols and statues. This is the meaning of the verse according to the scholars. End quote

Commentary on the verse in which Allaah says (interpretation of the meaning): “But as for those who disbelieve, their Awliyaa’ (supporters and helpers) are Taaghoot (false deities and false leaders), they bring them out from light into darkness” [al-Baqarah 2:257]

Allaah says (interpretation of the meaning): “But as for those who disbelieve, their Awliyaa’ (supporters and helpers) are Taaghoot (false deities and false leaders), they bring them out from light into darkness” [al-Baqarah 2:257]. What is meant by light in this verse?.

Praise be to Allaah.
Allaah is the close friend of those who believe, and their support, help, and guide. He brings them forth from darkness -- the darkness of shirk, the darkness of sin and of innovation -- to the light of Tawheed, truth and faith, i.e., by means of His Messengers, and by means of His Books that He revealed. But the disbelievers of Quraysh and the disbelievers among the children of Israel and others, their supporters and helpers are the Taghoot or false deities and false leaders. The Taghoot are the devils among mankind and the jinn. The devils among mankind and the jinn are the helpers and supporters of the disbelievers; they bring them forth from the light of Tawheed to the darkness of shirk, ignorance, sin and innovation. So what is meant by light in this verse is: Tawheed, faith and guidance, and darkness means shirk, sin and innovation. We ask Allaah to keep us safe and sound. End quote.

Does being raised to the status of their parents in Paradise apply to all offspring, young and old?

I read that one of the favours of Allaah is that He will raise the status of children in Paradise to that of their parents who are higher than them, and that on this basis the children of the Companions will be raised to the status of their fathers, and grandchildren will be raised to the status of their forefathers, and so on, every generation will raise the following generation, down to our generation, so we will be raised to the status of the Companions if we are their descendants. This may lead to people being heedless about their actions and relying on this divine honour. What is your opinion?.

Praise be to Allaah.
The question raised here stems from discussion of the verse in which Allaah says (interpretation of the meaning):
“And those who believe and whose offspring follow them in Faith, —  to them shall We join their offspring, and We shall not decrease the reward of their deeds in anything. Every person is a pledge for that which he has earned”
[al-Toor 52:21] 
The scholars differed concerning the word offspring -- did it refer to young or old? Those who said that it refers to young children did not have any confusion about the meaning of the verse. Rather the confusion arises if the meaning of the word offspring is grown-up children. The more correct view concerning the meaning of it is that it refers to young children. Based on that, it does not refer to that which caused confusion for the questioner. The raise in status is for offspring in the sense of young children, otherwise the implication would be that all the people of Paradise would be of the same status. 
1.
Ibn Qayyim al-Jawziyyah (may Allaah have mercy on him) said: the commentators differed concerning the meaning of offspring in this verse. Does it refer to young, old or both? There are three opinions ... Then he said: The specific meaning of offspring here as referring to small children is apparent, otherwise it would imply that those who come later would be equal in status to those who came before, but there is no such implication if what is meant is small children, because the children and offspring of each man will be with him at the same status level. And Allaah knows best. End quote.
Haadi al-Arwaah ila Bilaad al-Afraad, p. 279-281. 
2.
Shaykh Muhammad ibn Saalih al-‘Uthaymeen (may Allaah have mercy on him) said:
If the children are destined for Paradise and the father is destined for Paradise, then Allaah says in His Book (interpretation of the meaning):
“And those who believe and whose offspring follow them in Faith, —  to them shall We join their offspring, and We shall not decrease the reward of their deeds in anything. Every person is a pledge for that which he has earned”
[al-Toor 52:21] 
Meaning that if a person has offspring, and they are people of Paradise, then they will follow their father, even if their status is lower than that of their father. Hence He said: “and We shall not decrease the reward of their deeds in anything” meaning, We will not decrease the reward of the fathers; rather the fathers will retain their abundant reward and the offspring will be raised to the status of their fathers. This refers to the children who are not excluded from the word offspring when they have their own wives and families. These will have a special virtue and will not be joined to their fathers, because if we were to say that each person will join his father even if he has a wife and children or he is on his own, then all the people of Paradise would be of the same level, because everyone is the offspring of the previous generation. Rather what is meant by offspring is those who were with him, and did not leave and have wives and children of their own. These people will be raised to the status of their fathers, and nothing of their fathers’ deeds will be lost. End quote. 
Fataawa Noor ‘ala al-Darb (tape no. 324, side 1). 
3.
And he (may Allaah have mercy on him) also said:
Moreover, Allaah says (interpretation of the meaning): “And those who believe and whose offspring follow them in Faith, —  to them shall We join their offspring…”[al-Toor 52:21]. Those who believed and whose offspring followed them in Faith -- the offspring who follow their parents in Faith are small children. Hence Allaah says “to them shall We join their offspring”, i.e., We will cause their offspring to join them in their levels in Paradise. 
With regard to grown-up children who have got married, they will be in their own levels in Paradise, and will not be joined to their fathers, because they have their own offspring, so they will be in their own places. As for offspring in the sense of small children who follow their fathers, they will be joined to their fathers, but this joining does not imply any detraction from the reward or status of the fathers. Hence Allaah says, “and We shall not decrease the reward of their deeds in anything”, meaning that their offspring will be joined to them, and it cannot be said that a deduction will be made from the fathers' degrees commensurate with the rise in status of the offspring, rather Allaah says “and We shall not decrease the reward of their deeds in anything”. End quote. 
Tafseer al-Qur’aan min al-Hujuraat ila al-hadeed, p. 187. 
And Allaah knows best.

Evil is part of the creation of Allaah and not attributing it to Allaah is part of proper verbal etiquette

Here is the translation of the Ayahs: 4:78 - "Wherever you may be, death will overtake you even if you are in fortified towers. If a good happens to them, they say:'This is from Allah," but if an evil befalls them, they say:'This is from you(O Muhammad).' Say:'All are from Allah,' so what (is wrong with) these people that they do not seem to understand any word? " 4:79 - "Whatever reaches to you of good, is from Allah, but whatever befalls you of evil, is from yourself. Allah has sent you (Muhammad) for mankind as a messenger, and Allah is Sufficient as a Witness." Is evil from ourselves or from Allah. Non-Muslims view this as a contradiction in the Qur'an but we all know that the Qur'an is free from contradictions. Can you please explain this?.

Praise be to Allaah.
Understanding this aayah is easy for the one whom Allaah enables to understand it. It is one of the unambiguous aayahs in the clear Book of Allaah, and there is no contradiction in it, except in the minds of some of the haters, who are aided by their ignorance of Arabic and of the meanings of the Holy Qur’aan, so they think that the words of Allaah (interpretation of the meaning): “but whatever of evil befalls you, is from yourself” [al-Nisa’ 4:79] mean that calamities, which are referred to here as “evil”, are created by man himself. This is obvious ignorance which no one falls into but someone who has no knowledge of the Arabic language, or an Arabic-speaker who is misled and overwhelmed by his whims and desires. That is because the preposition min (from) here, in the phrase min nafsika (“from yourself”), refers to the cause, i.e., it is because of you yourself, O man, because of your disobedience and your going against the command of Allaah, that calamities befall you, as Allaah says (interpretation of the meaning): “And whatever of misfortune befalls you, it is because of what your hands have earned. And He pardons much” [al-Shoora 42:30].  
Al-Haafiz Ibn Katheer (may Allaah have mercy on him) says: The words “And if some good reaches them” [al-Nisa’ 4:78] mean: abundance and provision, of fruits, crops, children and the like. This is the meaning of the words of Ibn ‘Abbaas, Abu’l-‘Aaliyah and al-Saddi. 
“they say, ‘This is from Allaah,’ but if some evil befalls them” [al-Nisa’ 4:78], i.e., drought, famine, lack of fruits and crops, or death of children, and so on – as Abu’l-‘Aaliyah and al-Saddi said. 
“they say, ‘This is from you (O Muhammad صلى الله عليه وسلم)’”, i.e., because of you, and because of our following you and following your religion, as Allaah said concerning the people of Pharaoh (interpretation of the meaning):
“But whenever good came to them, they said: ‘Ours is this.’ And if evil afflicted them, they ascribed it to evil omens connected with Moosa (Moses) and those with him”
[al-A’raaf 7:131] 
and as Allaah says (interpretation of the meaning):
“And among mankind is he who worships Allaah as it were upon the edge (i.e. in doubt): if good befalls him, he is content therewith; but if a trial befalls him he turns back on his face (i.e. reverts to disbelief after embracing Islam). He loses both this world and the Hereafter”
[al-Hajj 22:11] 
“Say: ‘All things are from Allaah’” [al-Nisa’ 4:78], i.e., everything happens by the will and decree of Allaah, which applies to the righteous and evildoer, to the believer and disbeliever, alike. ‘Ali ibn Abi Talhah said, narrating from Ibn ‘Abbaas: “Say: ‘All things are from Allaah” i.e., both good and bad. Al-Hasan al-Basri said something similar. 
Then Allaah said, addressing the Messenger (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him), but the message is to mankind, that the answer to this question is: “Whatever of good reaches you, is from Allaah”, i.e., by the grace, bounty, kindness and mercy of Allaah. 
“but whatever of evil befalls you, is from yourself” i.e., from you, and because of your own actions, as Allaah says elsewhere (interpretation of the meaning): “And whatever of misfortune befalls you, it is because of what your hands have earned. And He pardons much” [al-Shoora 42:30]. Al-Saddi, al-Hasan al-Basri, Ibn Jurayj and Ibn Zayd said: “is from yourself” means, because of your sins.  
Qataadah said: “Whatever of good reaches you, is from Allaah, but whatever of evil befalls you, is from yourself” [means] it is a punishment, O son of Adam, for your sins. And he said: We are told that the Prophet of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) used to say: “No man is scratched by a thorn, or stumbles, or has a twitching in a vein, except for a sin, and what Allaah forgives is greater.” 
This which was narrated by Qataadah in a mursal report was narrated in a muttasil report [i.e., with a complete isnaad] in al-Saheeh: “By the One in Whose hand is my soul, no worry or grief or hardship befalls a believer, not even a thorn that pricks him, but Allaah will expiate some of his sins thereby.” End quote. Tafseer al-Qur’aan il ‘Azeem (2/361-363). 
Shaykh al-Islam Ibn Taymiyah (may Allaah have mercy on him) says: 
Allaah says (interpretation of the meaning): “Whatever of good reaches you, is from Allaah,” [al-Nisa’ 4:79], i.e., what reaches you of victory, provision and well being, comes from Allaah, a blessing that He has bestowed upon you; even if it is because of your good deeds, He is the One Who has guided you, helped you, made things easy for you, blessed you with faith and made it attractive to you, and has made disbelief, evil and sin hateful to you. 
At the end of the saheeh hadeeth qudsi that was narrated by Abu Dharr from the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him), he tells us that his Lord, may He be blessed and exalted, said: “O My slaves, they are merely your actions which I am recording for you, then I will requite you for them. Whoever finds it to be good, let him praise Allaah, and whoever finds it to be otherwise, let him blame no one but himself.” According to the saheeh hadeeth: “The best prayer for forgiveness is to say: ‘Allaahumma anta rabbiy laa ilaaha illa anta, khalaqtani wa ana ‘abduka wa ana ‘ala ‘ahdika wa wa’dika ma astata’tu, a’oodhu bika min sharri ma sana’tu aboo’u laka bi ni’matika ‘alayya wa aboo’u laka bi dhanbi, faghfir li fa innahu laa yaghfir ul-dhunooba illa anta (O Allaah, You are my Lord and I am Your slave, You have created me and I am faithful to my covenant and my promise (to You) as much as I am able. I seek refuge with You from the evil of that which I have done. I acknowledge before You all the blessings You have bestowed upon me and I confess to You my sin. Forgive me for there is no one who forgives sin except You).’ Whoever says this during the day believing in it with certainty and dies that day before evening comes, will be one of the people of Paradise, and whoever says it at night believing in it with certainty and dies before morning comes will be one of the people of Paradise.” 
Then Allaah says: “but whatever of evil befalls you”, such as humiliation, fear and defeat, such as what befell you on the day of Uhud, “is from yourself”, i.e., because of your sins and errors, even though that is already decreed and ordained for you, because the divine decree is not a justification for anyone, and will not be accepted by against Allaah, or by people. If it were permissible for anyone to refer to the divine decree to justify what he does of bad deeds, then no wrongdoer would be punished, no mushrik would be fought, no hadd punishment would be carried out, and no one would refrain from wronging anyone else. This would cause a great deal of mischief and corruption in both religious and worldly affairs, which is something that no one can dispute, whether on a rational basis or on a shar’i basis. End quote. 
Majmoo’ al-Fataawa (8/113-114) 
Al-‘Allaamah al-Sa’di (may Allaah have mercy on him) said: 
Allaah tells us of those who do not know, who turn away from that which the Messengers brought, who are opposed to them: that if something good comes to them, i.e., abundance, a lot of wealth, many children, good health, they say: “This is from Allaah”, but if something bad comes to them, i.e., drought, famine, poverty, sickness, death of children and loved ones, they say: “This is from you (O Muhammad صلى الله عليه وسلم)”, i.e., because of what you have brought to us, O Muhammad; they regard the Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) as a bad omen as others like them regarded the Messengers of Allaah as bad omens, as Allaah tells us that the people of Pharaoh said to Moosa:
“But whenever good came to them, they said: ‘Ours is this.’ And if evil afflicted them, they ascribed it to evil omens connected with Moosa (Moses) and those with him”
[al-A’raaf 7:131] 
And the people of Saalih said:
“They said: ‘We augur ill omen from you and those with you’”
[al-Naml 27:47] 
And the people mentioned in Soorat Yaa-Seen said to their Messengers:
“They (people) said: ‘For us, we see an evil omen from you; if you cease not, we will surely stone you…’”
[Yaa-Seen 36:18]. 
Just as the people of kufr think alike, so too their words and deeds are similar. This applies to everyone who attributes the occurrence of bad things or the loss of good things to what the Messengers brought or to part of it; that comes under this stern criticism.  
Allaah says in response to them: “Say: ‘All things”, good and bad, “are from Allaah”, i.e., by His will and decree and creation. 
Then Allaah says: “Whatever of good reaches you”, i.e., in your religious and worldly affairs, “is from Allaah” who is the One Who bestows them and makes it easy to attain them by facilitating their means.  
“but whatever of evil befalls you”, in your religious and worldly affairs, “is from yourself”, i.e., because of your sins and what you have earned, and what Allaah forgives is greater. 
Allaah has opened to His slaves the gates of His kindness and has bid them enter by His grace and bounty. He has told them that sins prevent His bounty, so if a person does them he should not blame anyone but himself, because he is the one who has prevented the grace and bounty of Allaah from reaching him. 
End quote. Tafseer al-Kareem al-Rahmaan (p. 188). 
Shaykh Ibn ‘Uthaymeen (may Allaah have mercy on him) was asked: 
Allaah says (interpretation of the meaning): “And if some good reaches them, they say, ‘This is from Allaah,’ but if some evil befalls them, they say, ‘This is from you (O Muhammad صلى الله عليه وسلم).’ Say: ‘All things are from Allaah’” [al-Nisa’ 4:78], then in the next verse He says (interpretation of the meaning): “Whatever of good reaches you, is from Allaah, but whatever of evil befalls you, is from yourself”. How can we reconcile between them? 
He replied: 
They may be reconciled by noting that the first verse refers to the decree of Allaah, i.e., it is from Allah; He is the one who decrees it. The second verse refers to the cause i.e., whatever of evil befalls you, you are the cause, and the One Who decrees evil and decrees the punishment for it is Allaah. End quote. 
Liqaa’aat al-baab il-Maftooh (no. 15, question no. 15). 
And Allaah knows best.

Wednesday, 11 January 2012

If the imam forgets some verses, how can he recite them so that he will have completed the Qur'aan?

If the imam forgets a verse or something of Qur'aan during Taraaweeh prayers, then he remembers it later on, what should he do? Can he have completed the Qur'aan in the prayer even though he did not recite this verse?.

Praise be to Allaah.

The reader will not attain the reward for completing the Holy Qur'aan unless he has recited all of it and not omitted any part of it. If he omits a verse and does not recite it, then he has not completed the Holy Qur'aan. 

The scholars even said that he should recite the Basmalah at the beginning of every soorah except Soorat Baraa’ah (al-Tawbah), and he should pay attention to that so that he will have completed the Qur'aan. 

Al-Nawawi (may Allah have mercy on him) said: 

He should always recite Bismillaah al-Rahmaan al-Raheem at the beginning of every soorah except Baraa’ah, as most of the scholars said that it is a verse, as it is written in the Mushaf and it is written at the beginning of all soorahs except Bara’aah. If he recites it then he has definitely completed the recitation, and if he omits the Basmalah he has omitted part of the Qur'aan according to the majority. End quote. 

Al-Tibyaan, p. 61, 62 

Based on that, it is essential for the reader to recite what he forgot of the verses, so that he may attain the reward for completing the Qur'aan. 

The scholars (may Allah have mercy on them) mentioned two ways narrated from the Salaf (early generation) of reciting the verse or verses that the imam forgot during Taraweeh prayers: 

1.     He should put all these verses together and recite them all on the last night of Ramadan. This is what the imams used to do in Makkah in the past.

2.     When he remembers the verse that he forgot, he should recite it [this applies if he is still reciting in the prayer] and then resume his recitation until he has finished. This was narrated from ‘Ali (may Allah be pleased with him). 

Shaykh al-Islam Ibn Taymiyah (may Allah have mercy on him) said, noting that the order in which it is prescribed to recite is waived in the case of forgetting: 

… if he forgets some of the verses of the soorah when praying qiyaam in Ramadan (i.e., Taraaweeh), he should not repeat it [the entire soorah] or repeat what comes after it, but if he deliberately changes the order of the verses in the soorah and recites the later ones before the earlier ones, that is not permissible according to scholarly consensus. 

Imam Ahmad (may Allah have mercy on him) was asked about the imam during the month of Ramadan omitting some verses from the soorah: did he think that the one who was praying behind him should recite them? 

He said: Yes, he should do that. In Makkah they used to appoint a man to write down what the imam forgot of verses and so on, then on night of completion he would recite what he had omitted. 

His companions -- such as Abu Muhammad (Ibn Qudaamah) -- said: Rather that is mustahabb in order to complete the Qur'aan and so as to attain a complete reward. The people of Makkah and Ahmad and his companions thought that if the one who had omitted some verses recited them later on when he remembered them, that was sufficient to be regarded as having completed the Qur’aan and to attain the reward, even if that meant the order of verses was not followed in this instance, because without reciting these verses, his recitation of the soorah could not be regarded as complete. This was narrated from ‘Ali: he forgot a verse from a soorah, then whilst he was still reciting he recited it, then resumed his recitation from where he had got to, and no one noticed that he had forgotten anything except those who were Haafiz (i.e., had memorised the entire Qur'aan). 

Majmoo’ al-Fataawa, 21/410, 411. 

And Allah knows best.